Bilingualism

That’s Not How You Say It: Examining Sociolinguistic Identities on the Pronunciation of Loanwords in English-dominant Bilinguals

Lauren Jung, Grace Lee, Sharii Liang, Felicity Ryan, Christina Tan

[expander_maker id=”1″ more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]

References

Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., & Kroos, C. (2011). Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 558–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.001 

Baugh, J. (2019, February). TEDxEmory: The Significance of Linguistic Profiling [Video]. TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/john_baugh_the_significance_of_linguistic_profiling

Chang, C. B. (2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.007

Charisse, R. (2017). One margarita, please! Language attitudes regarding pronunciation in the language of origin. Voices, 2(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3jk6z6tt  

Gudykunst, W. B. (2004). Bridging differences : effective intergroup communication. Sage Publications.

Hwang, J., Brennan, S. E., & Huffman, M. K. (2015). Phonetic adaptation in non-native spoken dialogue: Effects of priming and audience design. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.01.001  

Kang, O & Rubin, D. (2009). Reverse Linguistic Stereotyping: Measuring the Effect of Listener Expectations on Speech Evaluation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 28. 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09341950

Lupyan, G., & Dale, R. (2016) “Why Are There Different Languages? The Role of Adaptation in Linguistic Diversity.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 20, no. 9, Sept. 2016, pp. 649–660, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.005 

Shore, P. (2026, January 22). Authenticity of pronunciation. Language Log. https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=72656

Shore, P. (2026, January 19). A better pronunciation of “Davos”. Language Log. https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=72643

Stollznow, K. (2026, February 26). It’s never too late to learn a language – adults and kids bring different strengths to the task. TheConversation.https://doi.org/10.64628/AAI.d4nryq5fw  

TEDx Talks. “Why Language Shapes Identity (More than Race) | Malaka Grant | TEDxGeorge.” YouTube, 22 Dec. 2024, www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nKPLdZx8RY.

Wintner, S., Shehadi, S., Yuli Zeira, Osmelak, D., & Nov, Y. (2023). Shared lexical items as triggers of code switching. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 11, 1471–1484. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00613  

[/expander_maker]

Transfer Errors in Bilinguals: A Study on Heritage and L2 Mandarin Speakers

Charlotte Dow, Rachel Lee, Ellery Yu, Olivia Salazar, Yennie Song

[expander_maker id=”1″ more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]

References:

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological
Association. https://dictionary.apa.org/balanced-bilingual

Anderson, J.A.E., Mak, L., Keyvani Chahi, A. et al. The language and social background
questionnaire: Assessing degree of bilingualism in a diverse population. Behav Res 50,
250–263 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0867-9

Baker, M. (1988). The Hill Farm. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYCOw95Rr_k

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Sprouse, R. A. (2026). Negative versus positive transfer. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–6). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0084.pub2

Bayram, F., Rothman, J., Iverson, M., Kupisch, T., Miller, D., Puig-Mayenco, E., & Westergaard, M. (2019). Differences in use without deficiencies in competence: passives in the Turkish and German of Turkish heritage speakers in Germany. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(8), 919–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1324403

Biber, D., & Hared, M. (1991). Literacy in Somali: Linguistic Consequences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 260–282. doi:10.1017/S0267190500002269

Bigelow, M., & Tarone, E. (2004). The Role of Literacy Level in Second Language Acquisition: Doesn’t Who We Study Determine What We Know? TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588285

Chang-Smith, M. (2010). Developmental pathways for first language acquisition of Mandarin nominal expressions: Comparing monolingual with simultaneous Mandarin—English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(1), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909356645

Chien, YC., Lust, B. & Chiang, CP. Chinese Children’s Comprehension of Count-Classifiers and Mass-Classifiers. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12, 91–120 (2003).
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022401006521

Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press.

Deng, X. & Mai, Z. (2024). Input effects and unidirectional transfer in Mandarin–English heritage bilingual children: The case of spatial prepositional zai-phrases. International Journal of Bilingualism, 29(3), 651-666. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241229392

Du, H. (2022). Grammatical and lexical development during study abroad: Research on a corpus of spoken L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 55(4), 985–1005.
https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12631

Eisenchlas, S. A., Schalley, A. C., & Guillemin, D. (2013). The Importance of Literacy in the Home Language: The View From Australia: The View From Australia. Sage Open, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013507270

Eyring, J. L. (2014). Adult Learners in English as a Second/Foreign Language Settings. In Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language, Third Edition: A Self-Development and Methodology Guide (4th ed., pp. 571–572). essay, Cengage Learning.

Goldenberg, C. (2020). Reading Wars, Reading Science, and English Learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S131–S144. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.340

Gries, S. T., & Ellis, N. C. (2015). Statistical Measures for Usage-Based Linguistics. Language Learning, 65(S1), 228–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12119

Hao, J., Kubota, M., Bayram, F., González Alonso, J., Grüter, T., Li, M., & Rothman, J. (2025). Schooling and language usage matter in heritage bilingual processing: Sortal classifiers in Mandarin. Second Language Research, 41(4), 649–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583241270900

Jia, R., & Paradis, J. (2015). The use of referring expressions in narratives by Mandarin heritage language children and the role of language environment factors in predicting individual differences. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000728

Klein, W., Li, P. & Hendriks, H. Aspect and Assertion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18, 723–770 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006411825993

Li, J., & Bayley, R. (2008). The (re)acquisition of perfective aspect marking by Chinese heritage language learners. In A. W. He & Y. Xiao (Eds.), Chinese as a heritage language: Fostering rooted world citizenry (pp. 205-221). National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.

Montrul, S., & Silva-Corvalán, C. (2019). The Social Context Contributes to the Incomplete Acquisition of Aspects of Heritage Languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000354

Paradis, J. (2023). Sources of individual differences in the dual language development of heritage bilinguals. Journal of Child Language, 50(4), 793-817. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000922000708

Polinsky, M., & Scontras, G. (2020). Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 4–20. doi:10.1017/S1366728919000245

Sánchez, L., Goldin, M., Hur, E., Jimenez, A., López Otero, J. C., Thane, P., Austin, J., & Markovits

Rojas, J. (2023). Dominance, Language Experience, and Increased Interaction Effects on the Development of Pragmatic Knowledge in Heritage Bilingual Children: Acceptance of Null and Overt Subjects in Spanish and English. Heritage Language Journal, 20(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1163/15507076-bja10012

Shadiev, R., Liu, T., & Hwang, W. (2020). Review of research on mobile‐assisted language learning in familiar, authentic environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12839

Shortt, M., Tilak, S., Kuznetcova, I., Martens, B., & Akinkuolie, B. (2023). Gamification in mobile-assisted language learning: a systematic review of Duolingo literature from public release of 2012 to early 2020. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(3), 517–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1933540

Sopata, A., & Długosz, K. (2022). The effects of language input on word order in German as a heritage and majority language. Language Acquisition, 29(2), 198–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2021.1992409

Thordardottir, E. (2011). The relationship between bilingual exposure and vocabulary development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(4), 426-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911403202

Tong, X. & Shirai, Y. (2016). L2 acquisition of Mandarin zai and -le. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 5(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2016-0001

Appendix:

Video: The Hill Farm (Baker, 1988)

Presentation shown to participants

[/expander_maker]

How Fluent Is Fluent? A Proficiency Spectrum Among Spanish-English Latino/a Celebrities

Diana Cordova, Priscilla Hernandez, Sarai Ordonez Orquidea

[expander_maker id=”1″ more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]

Feature

References

BBC News Mundo. (2025, July 5). Shakira en entrevista con la BBC: Ser inmigrante en EE.UU. “significa vivir con miedo constante.” [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUPk1a4ln0U

Carr, J. R. C. (2014). One margarita, please! Language attitudes regarding pronunciation in the language of origin. Voices, 2(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3jk6z6tt

Casielles-Suárez, E. (2017). Spanglish: The hybrid voice of latinos in the united states. Atlantis: Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies, 39(02), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2017-39.2.08

Ciappara, D. (2024, July 8). How hollywood celebrities learned english in record time. Inlingua Malta. https://www.inlinguamalta.com/blog/how-hollywood-celebrities-learned-english-in-record-time/   

Jhos. (2015, January 13). Jennifer Lopez en Despierta America 2015 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbDa046KyHg

JLoGreece2. (2012, February 8). Jennifer Lopez Won AMA for Favorite Latin Music Artist of 2011 (HD) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbDa046KyHg    

Loureiro-Rodríguez, V., & Moyna, M. I. (2025). “Me aviento el English y el Spanish”: Spanish-English code-switching in Texas conjunto artist Nick Villarreal. International Journal of Bilingualism, 29(4), 984–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241261305

Mata, R. (2023). Bilingualism is good but codeswitching is bad: Attitudes about Spanish in contact with English in the Tijuana – San Diego border area. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 20(4), 386–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2136672

Montgomery, G., & Zhang, Y. B. (2018). Intergroup anxiety and willingness to accommodate: Exploring the effects of accent stereotyping and social attraction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(3), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17728361

Raichlin, R., Walters, J., & Altman, C. (2019). Some wheres and whys in bilingual codeswitching: Directionality, motivation and locus of codeswitching in Russian-Hebrew bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(2), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918763135

Recording Academy/ GRAMMYs. (2026, February 1). BAD BUNNY Wins BEST MUSICA URBANA ALBUM | 2026 GRAMMYs [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhvdOTvdpjs

Shenk, E. (2017). ‘So yo creo que es un proceso evolutivo’: Language ideologies among Puerto Ricans in southeastern Pennsylvania. Multilingua, 36(6). https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2015-0123

Tedx Talks. (2013, November 20). How to learn any language in six months [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0yGdNEWdn0

Telefe. (2025, November 30). Las mil vidas de Shakira: “Transforme el dolor en arte y mucha gente sano conmigo” [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t71lLIQ6wis

The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon. (2024, March 25). Shakira on Reclaiming Her Resilience in New Album After Ex-Husband, Cardi B Collab and NYC Surprise [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPmnZdaa1bk

Vogue. (2025, April 28). 12 Hours With Bad Bunny In Puerto Rico [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9dCHZdcEKo

60 Minutes. (2020, January 5). Superstar singer Shakira once teased by school classmates for singing “like a goat” [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIJEuifB9MQ

[/expander_maker]

Speaking Identity: How Language Choices Shape Cultural Belonging Among Young Kazakhs in China

Junyu Gong, Avneet Gosal, Ryan Hannani, Yana Jiang

[expander_maker id=”1″ more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]

References

Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). (2000). Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook for social research. Sage.

Burkhanov, A., & Chen, Y. W. (2016). Kazakh perspective on China, the Chinese, and Chinese migration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(12), 2129-2148.

Huang, X. (2003, November). Minority language planning of China in relation to use and development. In Conference on Language Development, Language Revitalization and Multilingual Education in Minority Communities in Asia. Bangkok, Nov (pp. 6-8).

Liang, S. (2014). Language attitudes and identities in multilingual China: A linguistic ethnography. Springer.

Liu, H. (2020). A socio-cognitive approach to code-switching: from the perspective of a dynamic usage-based account of language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.

Roulston, K., & Choi, M. (2018). Qualitative interviews. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection, 233-249.

Shoibekova, G. B., Odanova, S. A., Sultanova, B. M., & Yermekova, T. N. (2016). Vowel Harmony Is a Basic Phonetic Rule of the Turkic Languages. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(11), 4617-4630.

Xu, J., Zhou, C., & Liu, H. (2025). Cultural heritage as a key motivation for sustainable language protection: a case study of the Suzhou dialect protection project. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(9), 2930-2947.

Zharkynbekova, S. K., Tazhibayeva, S. Z., & Filchenko, А. U. (2025). Problems of Preserving the Kazakh Language in China: Threats of Extinction and Ways of Solution. Журнал Сибирского федерального университета. Гуманитарные науки, 18(3), 502-515.

[/expander_maker]

Bilingual UCLA Students Creating Identity By Navigating Language Choice

Maegan Abutin, Nicole Li, Melani Matian, Dev Patel

Keywords: Bilingual, code-switching, identity, UCLA students

[expander_maker id=”1″ more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]

Works Cited

Bahtina, D. (2026A). 6A: Conversation. UCLA Anthropology M150 Course Lectures.
Bahtina, D. (2026B). 8A: Practical work. UCLA Anthropology M150 Course Lectures.
Bahtina, D. (2026C). 7B: Multilingualism. UCLA Anthropology M150 Course Lectures.
Dingemanse, M., & Floyd, S. (2014). Conversation across cultures. In N. J. Enfield,
P.Kockelman, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology.
Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.021
Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Auer, P. (2013). Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity. Routledge.
Zentella, A. C. (1997). Growing up bilingual: Puerto Rican children in New York. Blackwell.

[/expander_maker]

Patterns in Personality Changes Amongst Bilingual Chinese Americans

Existing literature has long since supported the idea of a perceived personality change that occurs in bilingual individuals when switching between which languages they speak in. In this study, we interviewed ten Chinese-speaking Asian American university students by asking them surface level questions related to their daily life to discern additional patterns in the demographic. Ten people were interviewed in total, once in English and once in mandarin, with a period in the two between to allow for a mental “reset.”

Ultimately, we found there to be a strong pattern of Chinese being the more concise language, with the participants being able to organize their responses in a more effective manner and taking a shorter amount of time to respond to the questions. There also exists a contrast between the formality of the two languages, but the associations are dependent on the individual, finally, we observed differences in approaches to question answering, including different thought patterns and interpretations.

[expander_maker id=”1″ more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]

Introduction and Background

Bilingualism/multilingualism is a common phenomenon globally, though the U.S. does lag behind the rest of the world in terms of that trend. Language and how we use it is deeply influenced by social forces, like interpersonal dynamics, institutional context, and cultural association. All of this leads to the intriguing phenomenon within bilingual communities of a perceived “personality change” when speaking in a different language other than their mother tongue. While previous research has documented this perceived shift in personality, especially amongst bicultural speakers, much of the literature focuses on the confirmation of this phenomenon instead of questioning the reasons behind individual manifestations of this change. What our studies do is take qualitative data from various Chinese-speaking bilinguals and record in detail the changes that occur when they are answering the same questions between English and Chinese. We analyze these results with a sociocultural lens to discover how life experiences and background can manifest in the way they unconsciously carry themselves across languages.

Literature Review

The change in personality in bilingualism is well documented phenomenon (Chen, S.X., & Bond, M.H. 2010) and one largely informed by culture, as seen in the way that is observed only in those who are exposed to the culture of both languages (Bene-Martinez et al., 2002), in other words, it is as much a result of biculturalism as it is bilingualism. People cannot perform a frame switch without having both, which is a bilingual switch between culturally rooted self-concepts depending on the language they are using (Ross et al., 2002) and is a huge contribution to what people perceive as a change in personality. As an extension of that, the language used can directly affect the emotional state of the person with the culturally informed perceptions it brings (Zhou et al., 2021), resulting in different reactions to the same thing, which is what our research design is set out to test. And finally, to add onto the differing emotional reactions that come with language, the language used in a conversation can change a person’s logical interpretation of the situation. (Li et al., 2004) find that those who learned English later in life change their way of interpreting information depending on the language used, going from categorical in English to relational in Chinese. While those who learned at an earlier age in a singular culture where both languages are used officially by their country are observed no change in logical reasoning. Ultimately, showing that the culture of a language influences the thinking process of an individual, and that is then what causes a perceived change in their personality.

Our findings differ significantly from precious literature, as Chinese is a clear efficient language for most participants. Responses are shorter, more organized, direct, and confident. This is even true for participants who use English to communicate daily in an academic setting. On the other hand, English is perceived as a casualness, narrative and hesitation language. This informality is often accompanied by markers of uncertainty, like filter words: “um, like” etc., and more abstract or indirect wording.

Some participants stated that Chinese individuals process the ability to express emotions in formal settings such as family interaction. In contrast, influenced by educational background and social interactions primarily occurring in English-speaking environments, responses in English exhibit informality, emotional vulnerability, and lower confidence. This is mainly because for most of our participants, Chinese is typically the language of family, home and even primary identity formation. In this environment fosters directness, emotional boldness, and clarity; conversely; English is primarily the language of academic institutions, an environment that can both encourage casual peer interaction and create pressure and hesitation. Therefore, the shift in personality is less about moving from Chinese culture to American culture and more about transitioning from home self to the university self.

For example, one of the participants, Yunhan, expressed thoughtful uncertainty when saying in English: “I really want to be someone who brings value to society.” while expressing greater decisiveness and clarity when simply saying in Mandarin: “I hope to become a journalist.” Another participant also pointed out that English is emotionally causal but socially uncomfortable compared to Mandarin.

What is particularly noteworthy is our research challenges the widely held assumption that Chinese inherently promotes modesty and English promotes confidence. On the contrary, participants consistently associated Mandarin with clarity, confidence, and family comfort, while English represented education and social formality, but also elicited informal emotional expressions shaped by language insecurity and contextual associations.

Methods

Our target population is Chinese-English bilingual individuals who regularly navigate between Chinese and English language environments regardless of their perceived fluency in either language. This group includes individuals with different backgrounds and introductions to their spoken languages.

The interview asked the participants for reflection, analysis, and description of personal relationships and goals across six questions.

  1. What are your hobbies and interests? (你的爱好和兴趣是什么?)
  2. How has your week been? (你这周过得怎么样?)
  3. Do you like the school going to (你喜欢这所学校吗?)
    1. What do you like/dislike about it? (你喜欢/不喜欢它什么?)
  4. What do you think of your teachers this quarter?  (你觉得本季度的老师怎么样?)
  5. How’s your academic progress so far? (到目前为止,你的学业进展如何?)
  6. Tell me about your career plan. (跟我说说你的职业规划吧。)

Results and Analysis

  • Patterns
    • Chinese is the more concise and emotionally open one, the one they use with family and friends. Not formal settings. But also, cultural association tied to it
    • English: the language they use in schools and has formal associations with it depending on the person, but also cultural associations that make it feel more casual. Lack of proficiency can lead to lower confidence and less organization in speech

Table of Bilingual Interview Summary

InterviewEnglish ExpressionChinese ExpressionKey ContrastRelevant articlesExample quotes
CatherineCausal, personality-focused, uncertain toneAcademic, confident, conciseInterpretation changes based on different languagesLi et al. (2004), Ross et al. (2002)Eng: ‘They’re really friendly… I love them all’ Chi: ‘I feel they performed well’  
YiwenSelf-disclosure, humorous, confidentFormal, calm, respectfulSwitching from casual to respectfulBenet-Martínez et al. (2002), Zhou et al. (2021)  Eng: ‘8 a.m. class is a pain’ Chi: ‘I like the academic atmosphere’
Jiang JingReflective, hesitant, expressiveDirect, conflict, structuredTone and clarity shift sharply by languageChen & Bond (2010), Ross et al. (2002)  Eng: ‘I really want to bring value to society’ Chi: ‘I want to be a journalist’  
ZekunHesitant, casua l, repetitive ‘uh’Confident, simple, more decisiveConfidence and clarify increases in speaking ChineseChen & Bond (2010), Zhou et al. (2021)Eng: ‘Uh, parking is hard… uh’ Chi: ‘Just want to make money, step by step’  
TsamPolite, indirect, academic toneBlunt, humorous,emotionally boldShift in criticism and toneRoss et al. (2002), Benet-Martínez et al. (2002)Eng: ‘I really don’t like him… confusing’ Chi: ‘Feels worse than a dog’  

This analysis is based on the method of bilingual interviews, thereby constituting a qualitative content analysis. We see the effects of language on the personality of Chinese American speakers in everyday conversations expressed in the conversations that are bilingual. In every study case, interviewees were more careful and polite, as well as showing their emotional restraint, when they were speaking in English. They would frequently have to stuff their speech with language fillers and monitoring, which would not be the case with them speaking Chinese since they were more confident, direct, concise, and expressive in emotions.

A case in point is Catherine’s example, where the participant felt an emotional professional distance when she spoke Chinese, due to the way she “liked the professor”. Li and colleagues (2004) captured this in their study, as they too reported that the thought processes of bilinguals vary with their languages’ usage. That testified in all that the study cases put together, the participants went frame switching and speaking individualist, casual English tones, but collective, what-respected Chinese tones in a similar manner. The discrepancy in emotional tone from calm or uncertain in English to sure or strong in Chinese matches what Zhou et al. (2021) found: bilinguals adjust their approach to emotions in accordance with what is seen as culturally appropriate in the corresponding language. Furthermore, the differences in tone and formality within a language and evaluation style of different languages (Chen & Bond, 2010) found that bilinguals do not have one single identity but instead show different characters as they switch languages.

For instance, Tsam’s case study shows the frame switching with being hesitant and polite when the participant speaks English but emotionally blunt when she speaks Chinese. It demonstrates how language shapes different national selves (Ross et al., 2002; Chen & Bond, 2010). It is also found that language cues cause changes in how bilingual and bicultural people think, feel and act that are rooted in their culture.

Discussion and Conclusion

Our research team is composed of Chinese-English second language speakers who are mostly UCLA students. We learned that bilingual Chinese Americans also have a different sense of self when answering English compared to Mandarin Chinese. When they answered in Mandarin, the answers of the participants were shorter, more organized, and stronger. Their tone was more serious or formal too. When answering in English, however, people’s answers were more emotional, nervous, or unconfident. We also learned that people would be more courteous or deferential in some languages and more relaxed or blunt in others. These are not accidents, they are tied to diverse cultures, experiences, and selves that are embedded within each language. This means that language does not simply change the way we talk but also changes the way we think and feel. Our project allowed us to observe how bilinguals switch between different versions of themselves depending on context and language.

This character and expressive change reveal how much language can impact human behavior and identity. In most bilingual Chinese Americans, Mandarin speech will tie them to family, tradition, and cultural expectations, perhaps encouraging more formal or goal-directed responses. English, however, is often identified with their lives in school, in social settings, and in American society, where casual and emotional expression is more common and acceptable. These cultural associations partially explain why participants altered not only their tone but their modes of thinking according to the language. Some even reported that they “felt like a different person” when they switched languages, replicating how language can activate different cultural states of mind. By observing how bilinguals react to the same questions in both languages, we could witness exactly how malleable and dynamic identity can be. What our project illustrates is that bilingualism is not an issue of translation of words but one of constantly negotiating between two cultural worlds with two sets of expectations, emotions, and ways of presenting oneself.

[/expander_maker]

Code-Switching and Bilingualism in K-pop: Phonological Adaptation and Audience Engagement through Korean-English Lyrics

Hee Suh, Misuzu Nakazawa, Jafarri Nocentelli, Rutvi Shah, Joaquin Cruz

Introduction and Background

K-pop stands as a global phenomenon, not only for its captivating performances but also for its seamless integration of English and Korean. This study investigates how code-switching, which refers to alternating between two or more languages within a single sentence, enhances audience engagement in K-pop. By comparing older (pre-2015) and newer (post-2015) K-pop tracks, we analyze how the use of English has evolved alongside K-pop’s increasing global popularity. We focus on two listener demographics, L1 Korean monolingual listeners and global audiences, including L1 English monolinguals. The language aspects we are working with include intra-sentential code-switching and phonological adaptation. Our research aims to paint a comprehensive picture of code-switching’s role in shaping K-pop’s appeal. L1 Korean participants will be more likely to notice the adaptation, while L1 English speakers will likely notice increased English usage over time.

[expander_maker id=”1″ more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]

In this article, we investigate how code-switching in K-pop functions, focusing on its role in enhancing audience engagement. Intra-sentential is a type of code-switching where elements from one language (English) are embedded within a sentence structured primarily in another language (Korean). For example, a K-pop song might use an English verb or noun phrase, such as “make it rain” or “crazy 사랑” (crazy love), within a Korean sentence. This use of English within Korean sentences can enhance the song’s appeal to both Korean listeners and a global audience. Our target population includes individuals between the ages of 18 and 21, both L1 Korean monolingual speakers as well as global listeners, L1 English monolinguals, with minimal K-pop exposure. Our research will analyze phonological adaptation focusing on rhythmic and prosodic adaptations of English within Korean phrasing. This type of adaptation involves adjusting English words to fit the rhythmic and prosodic structure of Korean music. K-pop blends English into Korean lyrics by adapting to differences in rhythm where Korean’s syllable timing versus English’s stressed pattern makes the music appeal to both global and Korean listeners. The theoretical framework we will use is the Myers-Scotton’s Matrix Language Frame (MLF) to analyze how English integrates into the Korean structure and appeals to monolingual Korean listeners. The selected artists are global K-pop stars popular in LA, an ideal setting to study phonological adaptability due to the growing local fanbase of the genre (Burt, 2024). Our research question is: How has English usage in K-pop evolved across different popularity levels, and how does this linguistic adaptation resonate with different subsets of audiences (L1 Korean monolinguals versus global appeal)? Our hypothesis suggests that the use of English in K-pop has grown between 2015 and 2024. As its popularity grew internationally, code-switching has increased between Korean and English. In songs aimed at global audiences or informal settings, we expect more frequent code-switching and phonological adaptations. In contrast, songs focusing on cultural authenticity or Korean listeners may use English more selectively. Due to strategic linguistic adaptations, the patterns of syllable and stress have evolved in response to the increasing globalization of K-pop. Before this study, the specific patterns of phonological adaptation of English within K-pop and their differential impact on L1 Korean versus L1 English listeners were not fully understood.

Methods

Before looking straight into the phonological particles of this study, we want to understand the difference between the English language of older and newer K-pop songs. To do so, two participating groups completed a demographic Google survey sent through emails: Three L1 English monolinguals with minimal K-pop exposure and three L1 Korean monolinguals. These two groups were explicitly chosen because L1 Korean monolinguals understand and speak the domestic language of the songs(Korean), and L1 English monolinguals with minimal exposure have limited background knowledge of the Korean language, representing the global language and audience.First participants were asked general demographics, then presented with some terms and concepts to help participants understand the study better, such as rhythm and stress and what older era, songs released before 2015 and newer eras were songs released after 2015. After understanding the terminology, they were told to listen to the first two verses of two songs: one older and one newer release track from one of the K-pop artists, BTS and Seventeen, who are popular in LA. A little background was that the debut of PSY’s song “Gangnam Style” paved the way for international concerts to rise, with the global market growing by 44.8% in 2020.(Glasby, 2021; Oos, 2023). The years 2015 and 2022 were chosen with this fact in mind, where in 2015, many of the current popular K-pop artists debuted. One of them is Seventeen, and the other is BTS. The songs from Seventeen were: “Mansae” (2015) and “HOT” (2022), and the songs from BTS were “DOPE” (2015) and “Yet to Come” (2022). At the end of the survey, we asked two essential questions: 1) Do the English lyrics in this song match the Korean rhythm and pronunciation, and 2)Can you identify specific words or phrases where the English lyrics were adapted? By identifying the two questions, we analyzed the differences in which they noticed and what type of changes each group noticed more.

In order to conduct our qualitative data, we investigated stress patterns in the English lyrics of K-pop songs using Praat software. Stress was measured by analyzing spectrograms and waveform data, identifying syllables with higher intensity peaks, and recording their durations in milliseconds. These measurements helped us determine how stress in English lyrics was adapted to fit the balanced rhythmic structure of Korean songs. In this analysis, we also examined the alignment of stressed syllables with surrounding Korean lyrics to understand the degree of rhythmic congruence.

The methodology was designed to capture the differences in stress and rhythm between Old and New Era songs, using precise timestamps to compare English syllables embedded in bilingual lyrics. For example, in “Dope” (BTS), an Old Era track, the word “party” maintained its natural English stress pattern, with the second syllable emphasized and lasting approximately 200 milliseconds longer than the average Korean syllable. By contrast, in “Yet to Come” (BTS), a New Era song, the phrase “dreams come true” exhibited more balanced syllable durations, where each syllable was approximately 140 milliseconds, blending seamlessly into the Korean rhythm. These observations were validated through auditory analysis to ensure that the measurements aligned with listeners’ perception of rhythmic congruence.

Exploring stress and rhythmic patterns in this way is critical for understanding bilingual media consumption. In bilingual contexts like K-pop, successful integration of English lyrics into Korean songs depends on aligning distinct rhythmic and phonological systems. By adapting stress patterns to conform to Korean syllable timing, producers create a more cohesive listening experience for both local and global audiences. This analysis thus sheds light on how bilingual media can balance cultural authenticity with accessibility, enhancing its appeal across linguistic boundaries. To collect quantitative data, once again using Praat, we looked into one line from each song that contained intra-sentential code-switching to analyze the syllable duration for each language. Separating each syllable into its own section, we first measured the syllables in milliseconds and added each syllable to its belonging words. This is due to the need to account for the rhythmic adaptation of English stress patterns within Korean phrases, keeping both languages’ syllable duration more precise to compare. Then, we calculated the average syllable duration for each language and compared the length in older and newer songs to see if, in newer songs, the English words were phonologically adapted to align with their Korean counterparts.

Results and Analysis

Figure 1: BTS “DOPE” syllable duration Results and Analysis

Our study revealed increased integration of English lyrics and phonological adaptations over time. This was first highlighted in our findings from our Google survey, the data of which was converted into a graph generated by Python.

The graph below represents two pieces of data collected from the Google form. The left graph shows the results from “English Words Noticed in Older vs. Newer Songs,” and the right graph shows the “Adaptation Noticed in Older vs. Newer Songs.”

Figure 2: Google Survey Python Generated Charts

The first graph revealed that L1 English monolinguals with minimal K-pop exposure noticed significantly more English words in newer songs than in older songs. In older songs, they noticed a mean of 5 words and a mean of 15 in newer songs. Similarly, L1 Korean monolinguals also saw an increase in English lyrics, though they noticed slightly less than L1 English monolinguals. In older songs, they noticed a mean of 4 and 10 words in the newer songs. In contrast, the second graph revealed that L1 korean monolinguals were more likely to notice phonological adaptations in newer songs, reflecting shifts toward a more balanced syllable usage that aligns English with Korean rhythm and timing. As presented in the graphs, L1 English speakers were slightly less likely to realize these phonological adaptations. These findings underline how newer K-pop tracks cater to both global and domestic audiences through strategic adaptations where English lyrics are adjusted to preserve their clarity while fitting into the korean rhythm.

Our study highlights a significant evolution in the integration of English lyrics and their phonological adaptations in K-pop over time. Using Praat software, we observed how syllable durations evolved, showcasing the interplay between English stress patterns and Korean rhythmic norms across Old and New Era songs.

In “Dope” (BTS), an Old Era track, English stress often disrupted Korean rhythm. For instance, the syllable “Gent-” in “Ladies and Gentlemen” lasted 200 ms, longer than the Korean syllable “Ayo” at 180 ms. Similarly, “Cause we got fire” featured “fire” at 330 ms, highlighting mismatched timing. Conversely, the New Era track “Yet to Come” (BTS) exhibited greater alignment, with “past” and “best” balanced at 690 ms, closely matching adjacent Korean syllables. A similar trend was seen in Seventeen’s “Mansae”, where mismatches occurred with “name” at 310 ms and “teen” at 280 ms. However, in “Hot”, the New Era song, phrases like “Spicy feelin’” featured evenly timed syllables (~210 ms), harmonizing with the Korean rhythm. Aggregated averages reinforced these findings: in “Dope”, Korean syllables averaged 535 ms, while English averaged 1,183 ms, creating a 500 ms gap. This narrowed significantly in “Yet to
Come” to a 100 ms gap (639 ms vs. 726 ms). Similar alignment improvements were observed in Seventeen’s tracks. These results highlight the significance of adapting English stress patterns to fit Korean rhythms in bilingual media consumption. Such adaptations enhance accessibility for both global and local audiences, enabling K-pop to transcend language barriers. By harmonizing distinct phonological systems, producers create music that resonates culturally and emotionally with diverse audiences. This strategic linguistic integration underscores K-pop’s role as a global phenomenon, balancing cultural authenticity with international appeal.

Figure 3: Syllable Duration of Old Vs. New Era Songs Generated via Python

Figure 4: Syllable Duration for Phrases of Interest (Old vs. New Era) Generated via Python

Figure 5: Python Code For Figures 3 & 4

With the praat software, we calculated the syllable duration, looked into the average syllable duration, and input it into a bar graph using Google Sheets. In the first Figure, we analyzed the syllable duration in the signs between Old and new-era songs from BTS

Figure 6: BTS “DOPE” and “Yet to Come” Syllable Duration Comparison

In the 2015 song “DOPE”, we saw a significant gap between the average syllable duration in the korean lyrics, n=535ms, and the English lyrics, n=1,183ms, resulting in a 500ms gap. But when we looked at BTS’s new-era song “Yet to Come” in 2022, the gap between the average syllable duration for Korean, n=639ms, and English, n=726ms, the duration was closer with about a 100ms gab, aligning each syllable duration closer. The same case was shown in the artist Seventeens old-era song “Mansae” 2015 and the new-era song “HOT” 2022.

Figure 7: Seventeen “Mansae” and “HOT” Syllable Duration Comparison

In “Mansae,” the average Korean Syllable duration was n=400, and the English syllable duration was n=215, resulting in a 200 ms difference. Comparing this to the newer song “HOT,” the Average Korean Syllable duration was n=237ms, and the English syllable duration was n=309ms, a 100 ms difference. Though Seventeen’s results showed less significant change than those of BTS, both cases displayed a decrease in the duration of Korean and English lyrics in their old-era and new-era songs. BTS’s songs reflected a decline in English syllable durations compared to their newer songs; in contrast, Seventeen songs demonstrate an increase in English syllable durations. Both show how the English syllables were adjusted to align with the korean syllable durations

Discussion and Conclusion

K-pop strategically uses code-switching and phonological adaptations to engage diverse audiences while maintaining its cultural identity. Despite increased English usage due to globalization, K-pop adapts English lyrics to fit Korean phonological patterns, resonating with domestic and global fans. This reflects a careful balance between cultural preservation and international reach. L1 Korean and L1 English listeners showed increased recognition of English lyrics in newer K-pop songs. However, for different reasons, L1 English listeners noted the greater prominence of English, while L1 Korean listeners recognized the phonological adaptations to Korean rhythms. This suggests intentional design to appeal to both groups, reflecting either listener adaptation or producer strategies to bridge linguistic divides.

While globalization has amplified English use, K-pop prioritizes cultural identity. Newer songs like BTS’s “Yet to Come” and Seventeen’s “HOT” demonstrate smoother integration of English lyrics into Korean rhythms compared to older tracks like “Dope” and “Mansae,” ensuring a cohesive listening experience for Korean audiences while making English more accessible to international fans. K-pop thus acts as a bridge between local traditions and global influences, transcending language barriers without losing its roots. Higher English lyric recognition in newer songs underscores deliberate linguistic strategies by K-pop producers, highlighting the genre’s ability to adapt to globalization while preserving its cultural identity. Further research is needed to determine the consistency of these trends across different K-pop groups and genres, and expanding participant diversity could provide deeper insights into how linguistic adaptations influence listener engagement and cater to domestic and international audiences.

This study illustrates how K-pop reflects broader globalization in the media. By embracing English through linguistic adaptation, K-pop reinforces cultural identity while connecting with global audiences. Balancing cultural authenticity with international appeal, K-pop offers a model for navigating bilingualism and globalization. It contributes to discussions about language’s role in cultural preservation and global expansion and demonstrates how media can connect audiences worldwide while maintaining unique cultural heritage.

References

Burt, K. (2024). How LA became the epicenter of K-Pop fandom in the U.S. Thrillist. https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/los-angeles/k-pop-in-la

Can Code-Switched texts activate a knowledge switch in LLMs? A case study on English-Korean Code-Switching. (n.d.). https://arxiv.org/html/2410.18436v1

Canagarajah, S. (2007). Lingua Franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91(s1), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00678.x

Glasby, T. (2021, May 19). How K-Pop took over America: A timeline. Nylon. https://www.nylon.com/entertainment/timeline-of-k-pop-rise-in-america

Le, S., Campbell L. J., Orozco J., & SS, N. (2024). Code-Switching Habits of BTS. https://languagedlife.humspace.ucla.edu/bilingualism/code-switching-habits-of-bts/

Lee, J. (2020). Cross-linguistic prosody in K-pop music: Integrating English and Korean lyrics. Journal of Music and Linguistics, 12(3), 40–55. Luminate Data (2023). Mapping out K-pop’s global dominance. Retrieved from Luminate Data’s blog on global streaming trends.

Nazri, S. N. A., & Kassim, A. (2023). Issues and Functions of Code-switching in Studies on Popular Culture: A Systematic Literature review. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v13i2.9585

Oos, O. (2023b, December 5). When did K-Pop start becoming a global phenomenon – ononestudios.com. ononestudios.com. =The%20genre%20began%20to%20gain,to%20television%20dramas%20and%20cuisine

Rothman, J. (2009). Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339814

Schneider, I. (2023). English’s expanding linguistic foothold in K-pop lyrics: A mixed methods approach. English Today, 40(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078423000275

Shim, D. (2005). Hybridity and the rise of Korean popular culture in Asia. Media Culture & Society, 28(1), 25–44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254737351_Hybridity_and_the_Rise_of_Korea n_Popular_Culture_in_Asia

Zhang, J. (2023). Language, cultural hybridity, and resistance in K-Pop: A linguistic analysis of Korean pop music lyrics and performances. International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinary Business Information Systems, 3(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.59889/ijembis.v3i3.186

[/expander_maker]

Musical Multilingualism: Constraints and Creativity in Bilingual Songwriting

Cia Evangelino, Saffiya Haque, Allie Kuo, Emma Montilla, Renee Rubanowitz

In music, switching between languages isn’t just linguistic— it’s poetic. Spanglish is in the studio, and it’s topping the charts. This study explores how bilingual artistry harnesses code-switching as a creative tool as it reshapes the landscape of contemporary music.

Code-switching typically signals affiliation or belonging in a community or conveys language-specific ideas, but it evolves into a deliberate stylistic choice in music and art. However, does creative liberty coincide with linguistic constraints? Our research investigates whether song lyrics, as a form of poetry, prioritize meaning over grammatical perseverance.

This article examines how bilingual artists implement code-switching into their lyrics, analyzing their use of borrowing and blending through the lens of Code Copying Framework and Poplack’s constraints.

We focused on the bilingual lyrics of Rosalía and Kali Uchis, two Spanish-language musicians with distinct bilingual backgrounds. Our analysis revealed that Rosalía, as an L2 English speaker, predominantly uses shorter borrowings and code copies to preserve English-specific semantic nuances, often refraining from full code-switching. In contrast, Kali Uchis, a simultaneous English-Spanish bilingual, employs/favors longer, fluid borrowings at clausal boundaries, seamlessly switching between two languages line by line. We hypothesize that these differences in their approach to bilingual lyricism come from their dominant language preferences and differing linguistic proficiencies.

[expander_maker id=”1″ more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]

Introduction and Background

In today’s world, bilingual music is a new and exciting way for artists to express their identity and connect with different groups of people. Look at Rosalía or Kali Uchis, for example: they both switch seamlessly from Spanish to English, often in the middle of their lyrics. What’s really happening when these artists switch languages so effortlessly? Is it just a trendy way to mix things up, or is more happening beneath the surface?

This blog delves into how bilingual artists navigate the linguistic restrictions surrounding code-switching in music. We will test if certain constraints governing spoken Spanish and English also apply in a musical context. Specifically, we will look at whether Johanson’s (2011) code copying framework and Poplack’s constraints (1980) still hold up in a lyrical format.

To understand what happens when bilingual artists code-switch in their lyrics, it helps first to unpack what code-switching is. Code-switching occurs when a speaker alternates between two languages within or between sentences. For example, Kali Uchis has a song lyric that goes, “That’s the only thing que me da alegría,” which means “That’s the only thing that brings me joy.” Here, she casually switches from English to Spanish mid-song.

According to Poplack (1980), there are some crucial grammatical constraints that bilinguals tend to follow when switching between languages, including the free morpheme constraint, which suggests that bilinguals are more likely to switch languages when one of the languages is a free morpheme. This helps to ensure that the switch does not disrupt the sentence’s grammatical structure. However, Timm (1975) argues that not all code-switching follows strict rules. Some switches and combinations of words may sound ungrammatical to bilingual speakers. Timm states that bilinguals make code-switching decisions based on the context and what feels natural in the conversation. In other words, code-switching is as much about communication goals and cultural expression as it is about grammar. However, there is another layer to all this, which is that of music. Lyrics are more than just spoken language; they are a form of artistic expression, so they have more leeway to break the “rules” of language and grammar regarding creativity. In music, artists like Rosalía and Kali Uchis often code-switch between English and Spanish to communicate and express their identity, emotions, and cultural background. In this context, code-switching may not always conform to the strict linguistic rules established by Poplack and others. These two artists’ flexibility in language reflects their different bilingual experiences and how they shape how they mesh languages in their songs.

Methods

To understand and answer our research question, we analyzed the lyrics of two prominent Spanish-English artists, Rosalía and Kali Uchis. We chose these two artists for their unique linguistic and cultural backgrounds and active use of code- and language-switching in their music. In terms of similarities, both artists are of a similar age and release Latin/Spanish music of similar genres. We thought this genre of music in particular, would be insightful to focus on, as the informality and structure of their song lyrics are a contrast from previous code-switching examples we have looked at through this course. Both women have also each built an alternative, trend-setting brand image and self-identities that hinge largely on themes of confidence, sex positivity, femininity, and empowerment.

Rosalia, photo via Europa Press News                            Kali Uchis, photo via Felipe Q Noguiera

Beyond these similarities that allow for standardization of our data collection, we chose Rosalía and Kali Uchis because they also represent two distinct types of bilingualism and cultural experiences, providing a rich contrast for analysis. Rosalía, born in Catalonia, Spain, is a sequential bilingual who grew up speaking Spanish and Catalan as her native languages before learning English later in life — we categorized her as an L2 English speaker. While she began her music career with a strong focus on Flamenco and traditional Spanish music, Rosalía recently transitioned into Latin and alternative reggaetón-inspired pop. Kali Uchis, in contrast, is a simultaneous bilingual born in the United States to Colombian parents. Growing up, she was exposed to both Spanish and English equally, having spent significant time in both Virginia, USA and Colombia. This dual-culture childhood is reflected in the blending of the two languages in her songs. Her discography began predominantly in English but has recently shifted to more Latin music. By examining these two artists, we hoped to explore how their bilingual backgrounds shape their distinct approaches to code-switching and linguistic creativity and how their different upbringings may have manifested themselves into their music.

We collected data by identifying ten songs from each of these two artists. We used the metric of the number of Spotify streams per song to choose their most popular music. In our data filtering, we only ensured to include tracks where the artists held writing credits, as this guaranteed that the observed code-switching and linguistic patterns came directly from their creative process rather than external songwriters that we would not know their linguistics backgrounds. Because of this in mind, we chose to include collaborations and feature songs, such as New Woman (LISA feat. Rosalía) and SI NO ES CONTIGO – REMIX (Cris Mj feat. Kali Uchis & JHAYCO), as these song features tended to be 1) highly streamed, and 2) written by the artists themselves. Then, to narrow our focus to bilingualism in music, we excluded songs entirely in Spanish or English, as these songs were not tailored to our interests and would not illustrate instances of bilingual code-switching. Lyrics were sourced from Genius, a widely used database for accurate song transcription, translations from the Genius community comments, or from members of our group who are beginning L2 Spanish speakers.

Example of songs taken from Rosalia’s Spotify artist profile, including streams

After selecting 23 songs for our dataset, we parsed each song, compiling lines of lyrics in which a language switch occurred. To identify these switches, we applied the established definitions of intra- and inter-sentential switching and the structure of the code-copying framework. These lyrics were documented and later analyzed on a robust spreadsheet.

Song Selection Data Samples
Kali Uchis
Song: SAD GIRLZ LUV MONEY Remix – Feature   2021 Release 461.5m Approx. Spotify StreamsLyric: Yeah, you’ve been starin’ at me (¿Por qué me miras?) That’s the only thing que me da alegría Yo quiero sentirte inside of me
Song: Moonlight   2023 Release 829.8m Approx. Spotify StreamsLyric: I just wanna get high with my lover, Veo una muñeca cuando miro en el espejo
Song: telepatía   2020 ReleaseLyric: If you want it, you could take a private plane, a kilómetros estamos conectando


1.2b Approx. Spotify StreamsY me prendes aunque no me estés tocando
Song: Igual Que Un Angel   2024 Release 332m Approx. Spotify StreamsLyric: You should’ve seen the way she looked, igual que un angel Heaven’s her residence y ella no se va a caer
Rosalia
Song: Despecha   2022 Release 1.1b Approx. Spotify StreamsLyric: Hoy salgo con mi baby de la disco corona, corona, yeah
Song: New Woman – Feature   2024 Release 223m Approx. Spotify StreamsLyric: Puta, soy la Rosalía, solo sé servir
Song: TKN   2020 Release 465m Approx. Spotify StreamsLyric: Zoom en la cara, Gaspar Noe
Song: Besos Moja2   2022 Release 442.6m Approx. Spotify StreamsLyric: To’ me queda bien con una white tee To’ me quieren casar, soy una wifey

Results and Analysis

In total, we collected data from 23 different songs released between 2019 and 2024, with 10 being songs by or featuring Rosalía and 13 by or featuring Kali Uchis. From these 23 songs, we extracted 19 (38.7% of data) data samples from Rosalía and 30 (61%) data samples from Kali Uchis – resulting in 49 data samples. Generally, most code-switching occurs as an intersentential switch, which means it happens at clausal boundaries between sentences instead of within a sentence.

The results we discovered while gathering our data prove some interesting differences between how sequential and simultaneous bilinguals code-switch. For example, Rosalía, a sequential bilingual who primarily makes her music in Spanish within the Flamenco musical style, is more likely to code switch in her music when in the Latin context or if she appears as a feature on songs with Latin artists. Meanwhile, Kali Uchis, a simultaneous bilingual, is more likely to code-switch in her music in general. Unfortunately, due to time constraints, we could not investigate how heavy of a correlation each artist’s background influences their code-switching/code-coping tendencies. Still, based on the data, we can tell each artist has a preference on how bilingualism is written into their music. We expected a vast majority of code copying to occur within our data. Still, only 40.8% of data resulted from code-copying versus code-switching, with an overwhelming majority of code-copying data samples from Rosalía (80% of code-copying samples). Comparatively, Kali Uchis heavily favors code-switching, with 80% of her data samples containing some form of code-switching. She tends to favor longer phrases of code-switching instead of single-word copies. The data table below shows examples of the different types of code-copying occurring with a song from each artist.

Song Lyric Data Analysis Samples
Igual Que Un Angel – Kali Uchis Kali Uchis, Peso Pluma – Igual Que Un Ángel 0:20-0:30
Lyric: You should’ve seen the way she looked, igual que un angel Heaven’s her residence y ella no se va a caerTranslation: You should’ve seen the way she looked like an angel Heaven’s her residence and she’s not gonna fallAnalysis: Selective copying: igual que un angel mirrors the English structure to retain meaning while adapting to Spanish syntax
fue mejor – Kali Uchis Kali Uchis – fue mejor feat. SZA 1:00-1:10
Lyric: Y me fui en el Jeep a las doce The backseat donde yo te conocíTranslation: And I left in the Jeep at twelve The backseat where I met youAnalysis: Global copy example: “Jeep” and “the backseat” are English words with all properties preserved and integrated into the lyrics
Besos Moja2 – Rosalia
Wisin & Yandel, ROSALÍA – Besos Moja2 2:22-2:33
Lyric: To’ me queda bien con una white tee To’ me quieren casar, soy una wifeyTranslation: It looks good on me with a white tee They all want to marry me, I’m a wifeyAnalysis: Global copying: the English phrases white tee and wifey are borrowed intact and function within the Spanish sentences without alteration
New Woman – Lisa feat. Rosalia LISA – NEW WOMAN feat. Rosalía 1:48 – 1:52
Lyric: Puta, soy la Rosalía, solo sé servirTranslation: Bitch, I’m Rosalía, all I do is serveAnalysis: Selective copy example: semantic meaning of “serve” is preserved, directly translated from English to Spanish

The types of copying that we came across in our data are:

  • Global copies (taking words in their unaltered form and using them within a sentence).
  • Selective copies (the structure of a word or phrase is kept while adapting to another language’s syntax).
  • Mixed copies (switching between one language to another within a sentence or phrase). From our data, a majority of the data uses mixed copying, accounting for 40% of the examples. Global copying accounted for 36% of our data, while selective copying accounted for 16%.

Discussion and Conclusion

From our corpus of lyrics, we concluded that code-switching in music tends to deviate from standard grammatical constraints and, therefore, does not strictly follow Poplack’s Constraints. Instead, code-switching in music more closely aligns with and reflects the artists’ bilingual background. Rosalía, a sequential bilingual, is more deliberate in her switches when using English in songs to identify specific concepts like “wifey” or “to serve.” On the other hand, Kali Uchis, a simultaneous bilingual, is more spontaneous in her use of code-switching; her fluidity between Spanish and English is representative of the dual integration of both languages in her identity. Still, we observed both global and selective copying in the artists’ lyrics and could conclude that global and selective copying are common and focal aspects of bilingual lyricism.

Nonetheless, we acknowledge the limitations of our investigation. Due to the temporal constraints of the quarter system, our project timeline was very restricted, and we could not expand the scope of our exploration and means of data collection. Thus, our focus on two artists and reliance on public information could have been a more comprehensive elicitation of analyses.

Revisiting our initial research questions: If certain constraints apply in spoken Spanish when code-switching to English, do they transfer over the same way into language in a musical context? What types of copying, following the code copying framework, will be found in song lyrics?

The integration of multiple languages in music has far-reaching implications for linguistic research, cultural understanding, and artistic expression. Understanding code-switching in creative language use provides insights into how language patterns manifest in nontraditional language contexts, namely under the influence of the artistic nature of lyricism and songwriting. Code-switching in music also enhances artistic expression by encouraging dynamic wordplay and rhymes across languages. It provides insights into the differences between different levels of bilingualism and types of multilingualism. Moreover, bilingual lyrics serve important cultural functions, as they represent the juxtaposition of cultures, promoting linguistic and cultural diversity, expressions, and communication. Within the music industry, multilingual music can unite different listeners’ cultures and expand the reach of artist audiences.

Although our research yields valuable insights, it needs to be more broadly generalizable to all Spanish-English or other language bilingual musicians. Future expansions of our study will include a larger sample of bilingual artists with a more extensive range of lyrical repertories from more diverse language backgrounds. It would be ideal to have direct access to artists’ accounts of their language to better understand their use and relationship with their respective languages as well as their creative processes.

An important consideration to account for in our investigation is the existence of code-switching patterns for Spanglish that do not necessarily apply to varieties of Iberian Spanish. The present investigation focused primarily on code-switching conventions within a musical genre rather than a dialect, assuming that an artist from Spain would adapt to Latin American dialectal features in this context, but dialectal differences may still occur. We are interested in understanding competing factors of bilingual acquisition and regional norms to further develop our research from this investigation, specifically, the influences of sequential and simultaneous bilingualism and regional norms for language in Latin American versus peninsular Spanish varieties. Additional research directions would look across different genres and investigate the reception of code-switched lyrics among monolingual and bilingual listeners, considering the linguistic influence of lyricism more broadly in language communities.

References

Cris MJ, Kali Uchis & JHAYCO – Si No Es Contigo (remix). Genius. (n.d.-a). https://genius.com/Cris-mj-kali-uchis-and-jhayco-si-no-es-contigo-remix-lyrics

Duran, R. P. (1984). Latino Language and Communicative Behavior. The Modern Language Journal. Exposito, Suzy. “Pop Loner Kali Uchis on Growing up Punk in Colombia and the Struggle to Stay Bilingual.” Rolling Stone, Rolling Stone, 13 Sept. 2019, www.rollingstone.com/music/music-latin/kali-uchis-isolation-colombia-interview-2018-7 00772/.

Gonzalez-Cruz, M. I. (2017). Exploring the dynamics of English/Spanish codeswitching in a written corpus. Alicante Journal of English Studies, 30 (2017), 336-361.

Johanson, L. (2011). Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework.

Lisa (ft. Rosalía) – New Woman. Genius. (n.d.). https://genius.com/Lisa-new-woman-lyrics Lipski, J. M. (2008). Varieties of Spanish in the United States. Georgetown University Press.

Loaiza, K. M. “Kali Uchis”. Lyrics to “ORQUÍDEAS” [Album]. Geffen Records, 2024. Genius, genius.com/albums/Kali-uchis/Orquideas.

Monteagudo, M. (2020). Spanglish code-switching in Latin pop music: functions of English and audience reception. https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/79796

Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes, I’ll start a sentence in Spanish Y TERMINO EN ESPAÑOL: toward a typology of code-switching1. Linguistics, 18(7-8), 581-618. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1980.18.7-8.581

Sayre, A. A. (2022). “Rosalia is unafraid to pull from every corner of the world.” NPR, NPR, 24 April 2022, https://www.npr.org/2022/04/24/1094491641/rosalia-is-unafraid-to-pull-from-every-corn er-of-the-world

Timm, L. A. (1975). Spanish-English Code-Switching: El Porqué y How-Not-To. Romance Philology, 28(4), 473–482. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44941606

Villa Tobella, R. ‘ROSALÍA’. Lyrics to “Motomami” [Album]. Columbia Records and Sony Music, 2022. Genius, genius.com/albums/Rosalia/Motomami.

Rosalía. (2022). Motomami [Album]. Columbia Records. Uchis, K. (2024). Orquideas [Album]. Geffen Records. Uchis, K, and SZA. “Fue Mejor.” Genius, Genius Media Group, n.d., https://genius.com/Kali-uchis-and-sza-fue-mejor-lyrics

[/expander_maker]

From LOL to JAJA: Code Switching and Community in Spanglish TikTok Comedy

Monique Tunnell, Lori Garavartanian, Marlene Ortiz, Melina Darlas

In the world of TikTok, where creativity knows no bounds, young Latinx creators are redefining what it means to connect through language. Spanglish skits on TikTok combine Spanish and English, making a perfect mix of hilarity and relatability. But these skits do more than just make us laugh, they create a sense of belonging for bilingual audiences navigating their cultural identities in a digital space.

Our study dives into the art of Spanglish code-mixing in TikTok skits to uncover how these creators build community through humor. By analyzing videos tagged with hashtags like #Spanglish and #Humor, we explore the linguistic features behind these skits—inter-sentential alternations and intra-sentential alternations. Focusing on Mexican and Puerto Rican dialects, we explain how these tools aren’t just random word choices; they’re powerful markers of identity and in-group solidarity. We see how viewers react to these humorous takes on bilingual life by looking at comments, likes, and shares and find that these skits are sparking conversations and fostering connections that stretch across the digital Latinx diaspora.

This research sheds light on why certain Spanglish patterns hit harder, gain more traction, and resonate deeper with audiences. Whether it’s through a hilarious Chicano slang twist or a clever Puerto Rican phrase, Spanglish on TikTok proves that humor isn’t just entertainment—it’s a bridge connecting identities, cultures, and people one laugh at a time.

[expander_maker id=”1″ more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]

Introduction and Background

Code-switching is a linguistic phenomenon that has consistently signaled community and group membership, in diasporas or otherwise. It is a feature of language that has often been used to show solidarity with other members of a marginalized group or to signal generational comradery. Persistent usages of code-switching have given rise not only to unique means of language usage, but to what some would consider entirely new languages. This can be seen not only through academic observations of bilingual speakers, but also through the lived experiences of those speakers. One particular space where both academic and personal reflections are abundant is regarding the usage of “Spanglish,” a unique combination of Spanish and English used by many in the Latinx community.

Previous research on Spanglish has found that in cities like New York City, Spanish-English bilingual youth have consistently reflected their cultural belonging and showcased their understanding of bilingual cultural norms through code-switching (Montes-Alcalá, 2024). These findings have helped build an understanding of how Spanglish is evoked as a cultural and social tool, rather than simply a linguistic phenomenon.

Personal narratives have also reinforced this perception of Spanglish as a cultural device. In speaking about her Spanglish usage during a Ted Talk, high school student Alondra Posada (2018) states that Spanglish helps people communicate, especially when they are struggling to learn both Spanish and English at the same time. She also states that Spanglish is a strong representation of both her American and Latinx communities, indicating that it helps her connect and feel comfortable within both elements of her identity. Spanish professor Dra Meduri Soto (2021) reinforces this concept when speaking about the U.S. Latinx community’s usage of Spanglish. She states that her relatives in Mexico usually admired Spanglish when they heard it spoken. She emphasizes that it was hard, if not impossible, to teach them Spanglish because she had acquired it organically as part of her American Latina identity. Generally, Spanglish speakers’ own conceptions and accounts of their Spanglish use reinforces its usefulness as a communication device that brokers understanding and a sense of cultural belonging.

Other studies have added onto this conversation by exemplifying how Spanish-English bilinguals have adapted their usage of Spanglish to other spheres, for example by using online content like memes to resonate with each other and with a broader Latinx audience (Dickinson, 2023). In the digital age, this usage of online resources has become increasingly significant, prompting one to wonder how community building via code-switching and Spanglish has been altered by social media apps and forums, as well as how digital connectedness has molded and shaped code-switching as a whole. These questions and qualms come at a time where content posted on Tik Tok specifically has taken the world by storm, allowing young people a new platform on which to gain popularity and connect with others. Existing research (Daulay et al, 2024) has already shown that code switching in Tik Tok and Instagram comments can shift subjects and showcase bilingualism between app users. Therefore, there is some basis to assume that platforms such as Tik Tok are already being used to create community and solidarity. However, not much is known, at present, about how specific linguistic strategies, such as intra-sentential switches or inter-sentential switches, function in TikTok’s humor-driven environment to build and sustain community connections. These key terms, as well as code switching as we use it in our research, have been defined in the following index:

This study seeks to fill the gap in knowledge regarding social media code-switching tools by analyzing Spanglish TikTok skits, focusing on Mexican and Puerto Rican dialects, to uncover how creators use language to entertain, unite, and resonate with bilingual audiences. By examining linguistic patterns and audience engagement, this research sheds light on how humor and language intersect to strengthen cultural identity in a rapidly evolving digital landscape. Ultimately, the research poses the question of exactly how Spanglish in Tik Tok skits is building humor and community in the Mexican and Puerto Rican online communities and how engagement metrics are reflective of this.

Before formally addressing this question, we had four personal hypotheses. For one, we believed inter-sentential switching would occur more often than intra-sentential switching. Next, we believed many videos would have both intra and inter-sentential switching. Third, we anticipated seeing many comments with personal pronouns and “humorous” emojis. Finally, we hypothesized that comments, likes, and shares would differ more than views when inter versus intra-sentential switching was used. These hypotheses were supported at varying degrees throughout our data collection process, as we will address.

Methods

To understand how bilingual people use Spanish and English in humorous TikTok videos, we picked eight content creators aged 18 and above who use skits and hashtags such as #Spanglish and #comedy. We watched eight videos where these creators mix languages, a practice we’ve already defined as code-switching. We counted how often they switched between languages and looked at two types of code-switches, both of which have also been defined above: intra-sentential switching and inter-sentential switching.

We studied how people responded to these particular videos by checking how many likes, comments, and shares each got. For example, we looked at what kinds of jokes people found funny, how many people saved the videos, and if they shared their own, often extremely similar, experiences in the comments. This helped us see which type of code-switching typically works best to make people laugh and relate to creators. We also noticed how creators used their language background, like “Spanish de rancho” and Puerto Rican Spanish, to connect with their audiences. By studying these videos, we aimed to learn how language blending can be a tool for creativity and connection.

Data Collected: Figure 1 showcases video analytics for a subset of the eight TikTok videos we analyzed for our results analysis. Figure 2 highlights types of code switching and examples of code switches utilized within the same videos. The five videos selected were the first five observed. Additionally, they included the videos with the highest numbers of code-switching, serving as valuable data to showcase.

Video NumberDialectsViewsLikesCommentsTop Comment Themes
1“Spanish de Rancho” & American English511.9k68.5K12831) Shared experience 2) Comedic effect, including mentions of laughter
2Puerto Rican Spanish & American English263.5k67.3k2051) Shared experience  
3Puerto Rican Spanish & American English92.4k76261011) Comedic effect, including usage of “cry” and “laugh” emojis
4Mexican Spanish & American English7.8M1M45991) Shared experience, particularly in familial settings
5Mexican Spanish & American English1.1M156.5k8571) Shared experience 2) Comedic effect, including usage of “cry” and “laugh” emojis
Video NumberDialectsNumber & Types of Code-switchesExample of code-switch
1“Spanish de Rancho” & American EnglishTotal: 28 22 intra-sentential 6 inter-sentential  “I told my patient ‘encuerate’”
2Puerto Rican Spanish & American EnglishTotal: 5 3 intra-sentential 2 inter-sentential“Estamos buscando una pillow”
3Puerto Rican Spanish & American EnglishTotal: 8 6 intra-sentential 2 inter-sentential“I cannot live in a caliente place”
4Mexican Spanish & American EnglishTotal: 3 2 intra-sentential 1 inter-sentential“How to say ‘to tag’ in spanish”
5Mexican Spanish & American EnglishTotal: 15 15 intra-sentential“I speak spanglish of course cuando se me olvida..”

Tik Tok Analytics:

Tik Tok analytics were collected for various reasons. We wanted to see, more generally, how many views, likes, and comments Spanish-English creators were getting for their “Spanglish” centered skits and videos. More specifically, we wanted to be able to compare analytics between videos that used intra-sentential and inter-sentential switching to see if any one of them helped creators gain more popularity than the other. Within the eight total TikTok videos we observed, some words and ways of talking did seem to make videos more popular, garnering more likes and comments. It seemed as though solely using intra-sentential switching was less successful in pulling in likes, relative to the amount of views videos garnered. Figure 3, seen below, exemplifies this. As a note, the average ratios were calculated by taking the ratio of likes to views for each of the eight videos assessed and subsequently taking the mean amongst videos

As can be observed within the figure, videos with both types of switches were over two times as successful at gaining likes when compared to their counterparts with only intra-sentential switches. The videos with both inter and intra-sentential switching often used both types of switches to mirror instances between Spanish speaking parents and bilingual children, occasions which likely evoke relatability. On the other hand, the TikTok videos where people mix Spanish and English in the same sentence didn’t get as many likes or saves, perhaps because they were harder for the audience to follow.

A more qualitative analysis of the video comments also revealed that the Tik Tok audience often uses words in the comments like “I”, “myself”, and “me”, because they are relating to experiences showcased in the videos. They additionally use emojis like “😂” and “😭” to show laughter or emotion. Sometimes, the audience even mixes Spanish and English themselves.

Other Results: After assessing our eight selected Tik Tok videos, we found the following, displayed in Figure 4:

We borrowed methodology previously used in an analysis of code-switching in Instagram videos (Wiraputi et al, 2021). This method looks at not only the number of code switches, but also what percentage of code switches are of a certain type. The methodology we copied had “tag-switching” as well, an extra-sentential type of switching where a speaker inserts phrases from one language into another, but we did not notice the occurrence of tag-switching within our videos and omitted it as a result. The results that we did find showed a few interesting phenomena:

  1. When Spanglish Tik Tok creators code switch in videos, they typically do so more than once. In fact, the average across eight videos was 9.25 code switches per video.
  2. Intra-sentential switching dominates code switching occurrences, taking up over 77% of the code switching we witnessed.
  3. Co-occurrence was in fact common. Only two of eight videos or 25% of content observed did not have both inter and intra-sentential switching.

Having analyzed all our quantitative and qualitative data on video analytics, comments, and occurrence of code-switches, our results yielded the following consequences as far as our hypotheses are concerned:

Discussion and Conclusion

This study of Spanglish humor on TikTok revealed that young adult creators frequently use intra-sentential code-switching, particularly in Mexican and Puerto Rican dialects, to enhance the comedic and relatable quality of their content. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, intra-sentential switching was more prevalent than inter-sentential switching, indicating that the integration of Spanish and English within sentences may occur more commonly with bilingual audiences. Another key insight we came across was the ways in which community and identity building proceeds amongst the Latinx community in the United States. Prior to our studies, we had understood that Spanish varieties, such as that spoken in Los Angeles, are often characterized by convergence, borrowings, and switches (Sánchez-Muñoz, 2017). We had been curious about the role that convergence played on social media and on Tik Tok specifically and whether the blends we witness in real life translate to online spheres. Our analysis pointed us towards the observation that Spanglish serves as a vital tool for expressing cultural identity and fostering community solidarity online, making humor a bridge between bicultural experiences. We also noticed while studying engagement patterns that videos that incorporate both intra and inter-sentential switching see higher engagement, pointing to the idea that utilizing many different linguistic patterns within the same video boosts performance.

Some considerations we have for future research into this field is the generalizability of our findings. Since our findings are specific to TikTok and its user demographics, they may not apply universally across all digital platforms or linguistic communities. Comparative studies across different digital platforms and research completed over a longer period of time could explain how digital code-switching presents itself in other contexts. In essence, the study underscores the importance of linguistic flexibility in digital content, which not only entertains but also strengthens community ties among bilingual Latinx viewers.

References

Dickinson, K. V. (2023). What Does It Meme? English–Spanish Codeswitching and Enregisterment in Virtual Social Space. Languages, 8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374657133_What_Does_It_Meme_English-Spanish_Codeswitching_and_Enregisterment_in_Virtual_Social_Space

Hamidah Daulay, S., Husein Nst, A., Randia Ningsih, F., & Berutu, H. (2024). Code Switching in the Social Media Era: A Linguistic Analysis of Instagram and TikTok Users. Humanitatis Journal of Language and Literature, 10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383171193_Code_Switching_in_the_Social_Media_Era_A_Linguistic_Analysis_of_Instagram_and_TikTok_Users

Montes-Alcalá, C. (2024, April 15). Bilingual texting in the age of emoji: Spanish–English code-switching in SMS. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/9/4/144

Sanchez-Munoz, A. (2017). Tempted by the Words of Another: Linguistic Choices of Chicanas/os and Other Latinas/os in Los Angeles. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345124311_Tempted_by_the_Words_of_Another_Linguistic_Choices_of_Chicanasos_and_Other_Latinasos_in_Los_Angeles

Soto, Dra. M. (2021, September 15). We Speak Spanglish ¿Y qué? World Outspoken. https://www.worldoutspoken.com/articles-blog/spanglish-its-who-we-are

Sanchez-Munoz, A. (2017). Tempted by the Words of Another:: Linguistic Choices of Chicanas/os and Other Latinas/os in Los Angeles. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345124311_Tempted_by_the_Words_of_Another_Linguistic_Choices_of_Chicanasos_and_Other_Latinasos_in_Los_Angeles

TEDx Talks. (2018). Spanglish is a Language Too! | Alondra Posada | TEDxYouth@UrsulineAcademy. In YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6N8Zk_EY6G8

Wiraputri, D., & Sultara, K. (2021). Code switching found in cinta laura’s video on her instagram tv. Journal of Language and Applied Linguistics.

[/expander_maker]

The Measure of Comprehensibility and its Role in Understanding Language

Kara Bryant, Cora He, Sydney Trieu, Monrelle Wilson

This study investigated whether being bilingual is an advantage for understanding various accents and spoken English when their first language is not English. To test this phenomenon, either L1 Mandarin, L2 English, or L1 English participants listened to minimal pair audios where they were asked to answer which word they heard, as either a free response or between two choices. The minimal pairs were chosen because one sound existed in Mandarin and English, while the other sound only existed in English. It was hypothesized that L1 Mandarin, L2 English speakers would perform better than their L1 English counterparts. The results of this study supported the hypothesis and found that L1 Mandarin speakers had greater accuracy in identifying the correct phoneme, specifically, there was a greater disparity between the two groups’ accuracy with sounds that only existed in English. These results indicated that bilinguals use a broader phonological framework, which helps them to interpret non-native accents more accurately than monolinguals. This research will help increase the corpus surrounding this area of research and could potentially inform teaching methodologies in order to build upon communication in multilingual and multicultural environments.

[expander_maker id=”1″ more=”Read more” less=”Read less”]

Introduction and Background

Our project aims to investigate how accented speech affects the ability to distinguish between phonological differences and intelligibility. According to Bsharat-Maalouf et al., the listener’s comprehension can be impacted by “the production of accented or conversational speech” (2023). Comprehension is the ability to understand speech differences and contrast between minimal pairs. In episode 61: When Accents Speak Louder than Words from the podcast Undark, Chee Kiang Ewe, a researcher and professor, explained that “because of [his] accent, on top of [him] speaking fast, it was really hard for student[s] to understand [him]” (Roberts, 2022, 4:17). This is not uncommon. Therefore, we aim to investigate whether accented English has an impact on comprehension for L1 and L2 speakers of English. We will test two different groups, one with their L1 English without any knowledge of Chinese and the second L1 Chinese, L2 English. We aim to investigate whether being bilingual is an advantage for understanding various accents and spoken English when their first language is not English. Our hypothesis is that L1 Chinese speakers will perform better on the minimal pair task since they have been exposed to both English and Chinese. Furthermore, we predict that the L1 English speakers will have a more difficult time during the task because they do not have the same amount of exposure to Chinese as the L1 Chinese speakers.

Our first target group includes L1 Chinese and L2 American English speakers. The language path for these speakers often involves overcoming significant phonetic and phonological differences between Chinese (a tonal language) and English (a stress-timed language). Research indicates that L2 English speakers with L1 Chinese backgrounds typically have trouble recognizing some English phonemes that do not exist in Chinese, such as distinguishing between /v/ and /w/, /l/ and /r/, /θ/ and /s/, and /ð/ and /d/ consonants or certain vowel distinctions (e.g., /iː/ vs. /ɪ/, /ɛ/ vs. /æ/) (Li, 2016). Studies highlight that these speakers might use different cognitive processing methods to adapt their L1 phonological awareness to understand L2 auditory input (Li, Cheng, & Kirby, 2012).

Our second target group includes Monolingual American English speakers. Monolingual English speakers comprehend audio information based on the way they know English sounds and forms, using highly automatic top-down and bottom-up processing techniques (Perfetti et al., 2005). However, exposure to non-native accents, such as a heavy Chinese accent, may create unfamiliarity that can disrupt comprehension due to different speech rhythms and systematic phonological processes that differ from unaccented speech (Vandergrift, 2007). The core linguistic aspect of this analysis is phonological awareness. Monolingual English speakers naturally process these prosodic cues but may face challenges with different phonetic segments that are absent in Chinese but present in English. The study will apply a comparative analysis of listening comprehension using cognitive processing theories. Vandergrift’s (2007) model of second language listening comprehension, which emphasizes the integration of bottom-up (decoding words and sounds) and top-down (using context and prior knowledge) processes, will guide the analysis. Perfetti et al.’s (2005) reading and listening comprehension framework will further support the understanding of how the ability to process phonological differences affects overall comprehension.

Methods

The project’s goal was to see if difficult minimal pair pronunciation in Mandarin-English bilinguals had an effect on monolingual English listeners’ comprehension. To measure this, participants’ selection of the correct target phoneme between allophone pairs was measured. For Mandarin L1 speakers, there are certain sounds in English that are perceived as allophones, which they have a difficult time distinguishing between and producing. Allophones are sounds that are perceived differently between speakers. This was done to see if there was a correlation between ambiguous or unclear pronunciation of minimal pairs and listener comprehension.

To conduct this study, a survey containing six minimal pairs, or twelve words in total, was created. Minimal pairs are two words that only differ in one sound. For example, a minimal pair in English would be “bat” and “pat”. The minimal pairs were selected as English phonemes that are difficult for Mandarin speakers to produce and distinguish between. For the experiment, the minimal pairs “vet” and “wet, “rot” and “lot”, “thin” and “sin”, “they” and “day”, “beat” and “bit”, and “bed” and “bad” were used. The “th” sound in “they” and “thin” and the “v” sound in “vet are consonant sounds not found in Mandarin, and are subsequently difficult for L1 Mandarin speakers to pronounce. Additionally, for the vowels, Mandarin does not make a contrast in vowel length, unlike English. Therefore, the vowels in “beat” and “bad” are more likely to be used interchangeably with their minimal pair counterparts (Li, 2016). For the audio sample, an L1 Mandarin speaker who was still learning English as an L2 pronounced the minimal pairs. For each minimal pair, the speaker produced the target word within a sentence to eliminate the factor of the speaker hyper-fixating on correct pronunciation. However, in the survey, the participants only heard the minimal pair/target word. This was done to eliminate the possibility that the participants would select the correct word based on context within the rest of the sentence.

The Google form survey was then distributed to 33 individuals, 22 of which were Mandarin, English bilinguals, and 11 of which were English monolinguals. The bilingual individuals only had experience with English and Mandarin. While the English monolinguals had no informal or formal exposure to Mandarin. The first section of the survey focused on demographic information. This section asked participants what their L1 and L2 were. In the second section, participants were asked to listen to the audio files. For the answers, participants were randomly assigned to a restricted or unrestricted environment for providing answers. In the unrestricted environment, participants gave their own free responses. In the restricted environments, participants were provided with two options and were asked to select between the two. For the unrestricted environment results, as long as the target phoneme was realized by participants, it would be counted as correct. Based on our project design, we hypothesized that the L1 Mandarin, L2 English speakers would perform better than their L1 English counterparts.

Results and Analysis

The data reveals that L1 Mandarin and L1 English speakers struggled with certain phonemes, most recognizably /v/ as in vet, /ð/ as in “they”, and /ɪ/ as in “bit”. These specific difficulties are thought to be due to the absence of these sounds in Mandarin, which would make them harder for L1 Mandarin speakers to produce. This might also indicate increased difficulty for L1 English listeners when comprehending selected phonemes pronounced with a Mandarin accent. In the case of L1 Mandarin speakers, they displayed greater proficiency in identifying these challenging phonemes when compared to L1 English speakers, which suggests that being bilingual may enhance adaptability when processing non-native phonological contrasts. When we introduced lexical priming through a restricted-response environment, where participants chose between two options, this significantly improved phoneme distinction and accuracy for both L1 Mandarin and English monolingual speakers. This was found to be more evident in phonemes like /v/, /ð/, and /ɪ/. For phonemes such as /w/, /s/, and /d/, restricting lexical choices sometimes led to decreased accuracy as in the case of English monolinguals. This may indicate that while lexical priming can help when distinguishing certain phonemes, it may also add confusion depending on the listener’s familiarity with the sounds. Our data reveals that L1 Mandarin speakers regularly outperform L1 English speakers when it comes to identifying difficult phonemes. This may suggest that being bilingual offers increased benefits when comprehending accented speech. This could be the result of bilinguals’ exposure to a variety of phonological systems, thus improving their ability to notice different variations in speech. On the other hand, however, L1 English speakers performed slightly better than bilinguals when identifying phonemes such as /s/, /d/, and /iː/ found in “beat”, likely due to their knowledge of native English phonological patterns. Both the L1 English monolinguals and the L2 bilingual Mandarin speakers presented a visible loss of distinction between certain vowel sounds. We found that participants would treat the phonemes /ɛ/ and /æ/ as interchangeable. This highlights the allophonic behavior observed in these two sounds.

Figure 1. Accuracy of participants identifying targeted phonemes

Based on the graph, L1 Chinese speakers may demonstrate greater proficiency in identifying the phonemes /v/ in “vet” (L1 Chinese 50%, L1 English 10%), /w/ in “wet”, /θ/ in “thin”, /ð/ in “they”, /ɪ/ in “bit”, and /ɛ/ in “bed.” For the phonemes /r/ in “rot”, /l/ in “lot”, and /æ/ in “bad”, both L1 Chinese and L1 English speakers might exhibit similar levels of accuracy. However, L1 English speakers may perform slightly better in identifying the phonemes /s/ in “sin”, /d/ in “day”, and /iː/ in “beat”.

Figure 2. Accuracy of participants identifying phonemes in unrestricted and restricted lexical selections

The graph illustrates that the introduction of lexical priming significantly enhances the accuracy of identifying the phonemes /v/ in “vet”, /ð/ in “they”, /ɪ/ in “bit”, and /ɛ/ in “bed” for both L1 Chinese and L1 English speakers. Conversely, restricting the lexical selections appears to result in decreased accuracy for the phonemes /w/ in “wet”, /s/ in “sin”, and /d/ in “day.”

Discussion and Conclusion

The data demonstrates that L1 Chinese speakers generally showed a greater ability to identify phonemes in several categories than L1 English speakers, supporting our hypothesis that bilingualism offers an advantage in understanding accented speech. For phonemes such as /v/ as in “vet”, /ð/ as in “they”, /ɪ/ as in “bit”, and /ɛ/ as in “bed”, L1 Chinese speakers performed significantly better, particularly when lexical priming was introduced. This suggests that their exposure to both English and Chinese phonological systems enhances their adaptability to variations in speech, including Mandarin-accented English.

In contrast, L1 English speakers showed slightly better performance in identifying phonemes such as /s/ as in “sin”, /d/ as in “day”, and /iː/ as in “beat”. These results may reflect their familiarity with native English phonetic norms and reliance on monolingual processing strategies. Interestingly, lexical priming decreased the accuracy for certain phonemes, such as /w/ as in “wet”, /s/, and /d/, indicating that contextual cues might sometimes interfere with phoneme recognition.

These findings highlight the cognitive flexibility of bilinguals in adapting to unfamiliar phonological patterns, supporting the idea that bilingualism provides a distinct advantage in processing accented speech. The results also suggest that bilingual individuals utilize broader phonological frameworks, allowing them to overcome challenges posed by non-native accents more effectively than monolinguals.

While the hypothesis is largely supported, the findings indicate that the advantage of bilingualism is not universal across all phonemes. The performance gap between L1 Chinese and L1 English speakers was more pronounced for certain sounds, suggesting that the extent of bilingual advantage may depend on the specific phonological features being tested. Future research could explore the impact of accent exposure or phonological awareness training on phoneme recognition in accented speech. Additionally, investigating a wider range of accented speakers and phonemic contrasts could provide more comprehensive insights into the adaptability of bilingual and monolingual listeners. These findings could inform the development of teaching methodologies that leverage bilingualism to improve communication in multilingual and multicultural environments.

Furthermore, TED Talk “The Benefits of a Bilingual Brain” presented by Mia Nacamulli, demonstrates the cognitive benefits of bilingualism. This talk explores the neurological benefits of language bilingualism, such as its cognitive flexibility, mental agility, and even perceptual gifting (Nacamulli, 2015). Though the talk is a comprehensive account of how the bilingual brain functions, it raises questions about how these cognitive benefits could transfer to real-world language abilities, like being able to comprehend different accents and navigate confusing linguistic landscapes. Researchers are still exploring how bilingualism could yield tactical benefits in processing and understanding languages.

In conclusion, we set out to explore whether being bilingual provides an advantage in understanding accented English. By using minimal pairs and testing L1 Mandarin and L1 English speakers, we discovered that bilingual participants demonstrated greater accuracy in identifying challenging phonemes, especially those not present in Mandarin. Our research revealed that bilingualism offers a unique cognitive flexibility in processing linguistic variations. While the advantage was not consistent across all sounds, we found compelling evidence that exposure to multiple language systems enhances speech comprehension. These insights not only contribute to linguistic research but also suggest potential implications for developing more effective communication strategies in multilingual environments.

References

Bsharat-Maalouf, D., Degani, T., & Karawani, H. (2023). The involvement of listening effort in explaining bilingual listening under adverse listening conditions. Trends in Hearing, 27, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165231205107

Li, F. (2016). Contrastive Study between Pronunciation Chinese L1 and English L2 from the Perspective of Interference Based on Observations in Genuine Teaching Contexts. English Language Teaching, 9(10), 90. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n10p90

Li, M., Cheng, L., & Kirby, J. R. (2012). Phonological awareness and listening comprehension among Chinese English-immersion students. International Education, 41(2), 46–65. Retrieved from https://trace.tennessee.edu/internationaleducation/vol41/iss2/4 Nacamulli, M. (2014). The benefits of a bilingual brain [Video]. TED Talks.

https://www.ted.com/talks/mia_nacamulli_the_benefits_of_a_bilingual_brain?subtitle=en Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill.

In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Blackwell.

Roberts, Lacy (Host). (2022, May 31). When Accents Speak Louder than Words (No. 61) [Audio podcast episode]. In Undark. https://undark.org/2022/05/31/podcast-61-accent-bias-sciences/

Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004338

[/expander_maker]

Scroll to Top